Bitcoin Long-Term vs Short-Term Holding Strategy: Which Is Better?
- 31 Oct 2025
The question of whether XRP—the digital asset associated with Ripple Labs—is a security has been one of the most debated topics in cryptocurrency law. The answer carries major implications not only for Ripple and XRP holders but also for the entire crypto industry.
In July 2023, a U.S. federal court delivered a landmark decision that provided some clarity, although it didn’t completely settle the issue. Let’s break down what the ruling means, why it matters, and how it could affect future regulation.
In December 2020, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed a lawsuit against Ripple Labs, CEO Brad Garlinghouse, and co-founder Chris Larsen. The SEC alleged that Ripple had raised over $1.3 billion through unregistered securities offerings by selling XRP tokens.
Ripple denied the allegations, arguing that XRP is not a security but rather a digital currency used for cross-border payments. The outcome of the case would determine how the U.S. government treats not just XRP, but potentially many other cryptocurrencies.
In July 2023, Judge Analisa Torres of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled that XRP is not a security when sold to the general public on exchanges. However, she also found that XRP sales to institutional investors—involving contracts and direct relationships with Ripple—did constitute unregistered securities offerings.
In short:
This decision was significant because it established a distinction between different types of crypto transactions. The court applied the Howey Test—a legal standard used to determine what qualifies as an “investment contract.”
The Howey Test asks whether there is:
Institutional buyers had a direct expectation of profit based on Ripple’s business activities, while retail traders buying XRP on exchanges did not have that same relationship or expectation.
After the ruling, major cryptocurrency exchanges such as Coinbase, Kraken, and Bitstamp relisted XRP for trading. The price of XRP surged temporarily as investors celebrated the partial victory for Ripple.
However, the decision didn’t end all uncertainty. The SEC appealed parts of the ruling, and the legal process continues. Regulators could still issue new guidance or legislation that changes how XRP—or similar tokens—are treated in the future.
For everyday investors and XRP users:
Possibly. While the 2023 ruling clarified key aspects, it does not permanently fix XRP’s legal status. The SEC’s appeal, potential new court decisions, or future U.S. crypto laws could shift the classification again.
For now, XRP occupies a “partial win” status—not a security for retail sales, but a security for certain institutional sales.
The XRP case marks a turning point for digital-asset regulation in the U.S. It’s the first time a court differentiated between how a cryptocurrency is sold and whether that changes its classification under securities law.
While XRP gained legal breathing room, the broader crypto market continues to await a consistent regulatory framework that clarifies which tokens are securities and which are commodities or currencies.
No, not for most transactions. The court ruled that XRP is not a security when sold to retail investors on exchanges, but certain institutional sales by Ripple were considered securities.
Institutional buyers had contracts and expectations tied directly to Ripple’s performance, which met the legal definition of an investment contract. Retail buyers simply traded XRP like other cryptocurrencies without that relationship.
Not entirely. The SEC’s appeal and possible new laws could affect XRP’s classification in the future. Current clarity applies only to the transactions covered in the court’s decision.
The XRP ruling could set a precedent for how courts evaluate other tokens, especially those involved in ongoing SEC actions. It may encourage regulators to adopt more nuanced, case-by-case approaches.
XRP remains tradeable on major exchanges, and the court’s decision provides partial clarity. However, crypto investors should stay informed about legal developments, as regulatory frameworks continue to evolve.
