Bitcoin Long-Term vs Short-Term Holding Strategy: Which Is Better?
- 31 Oct 2025
The explosive growth of decentralized applications (dApps), non-fungible tokens (NFTs), and decentralized finance (DeFi) has placed immense pressure on blockchain networks. Among them, Solana has distinguished itself by offering one of the highest throughput capacities in the ecosystem. However, high usage has brought challenges — most notably network congestion. This article delves into how Solana handles congestion, its architectural design, recent improvements, and future developments aimed at ensuring scalability and reliability.
To appreciate how Solana mitigates congestion, it’s essential to understand the unique architecture that sets it apart:
Solana uses Proof of History, a cryptographic clock that enables nodes to agree on the order of events without needing to communicate constantly. This drastically reduces overhead, allowing the network to scale.
Built atop PoH, Tower BFT ensures consensus even when some nodes act maliciously. It does so faster than traditional BFT algorithms because it uses the cryptographic time-stamps from PoH.
Turbine breaks data into packets, spreading it efficiently across the network.
Gulf Stream pushes transaction caching and forwarding to the edge of the network, minimizing confirmation times and memory requirements.
This architecture enables Solana to process over 65,000 transactions per second (TPS) under ideal conditions.
Despite its robust design, Solana has faced congestion — particularly during times of peak demand or spam attacks. The root causes include:
Bot attacks (e.g., for NFT mints or arbitrage in DeFi)
Unoptimized transaction flows
Low fee prioritization (transactions were initially too cheap, encouraging flooding)
Resource-intensive programs that monopolize compute budgets
These issues can cause:
Delayed or dropped transactions
Validators missing votes due to overload
Increased transaction failure rates
Solana has implemented several strategies to deal with congestion, spanning both protocol-level changes and validator client updates.
Originally, Solana did not prioritize transactions based on fees, unlike Ethereum. In 2022 and 2023, Solana introduced local fee markets:
Fees are now tied to account-specific compute units.
Programs and transactions using the same accounts must bid higher fees to compete.
This limits the impact of any one application (e.g., an NFT mint) on the rest of the network.
This move helps separate “hot accounts” (popular programs) from the rest of the system, reducing network-wide congestion.
To improve communication between nodes, Solana moved from the unreliable UDP to QUIC, a protocol developed by Google. QUIC:
Offers better flow control
Provides reliable packet delivery
Enables faster retransmissions when packet loss occurs
This switch has significantly enhanced Solana’s ability to handle high traffic without dropped connections.
Although not fully implemented yet, Solana has laid out a roadmap for state sharding. This approach will allow validators to process only a portion of the total network state, making it easier to scale as usage increases.
Solana uses a compute unit (CU) system that allocates a budget for each transaction:
Programs exceeding this budget are rejected.
Developers must optimize their smart contracts to minimize CU usage.
Solana Labs has also provided tools to estimate and control CU usage before deployment.
This model ensures that no single transaction or program can consume excessive resources.
Validators now maintain prioritized transaction queues, where:
Transactions are ordered based on fee-per-compute-unit.
Validators select higher-priority transactions for block inclusion.
This encourages healthy fee dynamics and discourages spam.
In 2021–2022, many Solana-based NFT projects overwhelmed the network with mint bots. In response:
Tools like Candy Machine v2 were introduced with anti-bot measures.
Solana implemented compute limits to throttle transaction rates and incentivize optimization.
Jito introduced a MEV (Miner Extractable Value) strategy using auction-based systems to:
Allow Solana to prioritize valuable transactions
Let validators earn more without spamming the network
This improved transaction selection and indirectly reduced congestion.
During a multi-hour outage in 2022 caused by a massive bot attack, Solana core devs:
Paused the network
Released validator client updates with spam mitigation
Instituted emergency patches to restore stability
Since then, improved testing and traffic simulation environments have helped prevent repeat scenarios.
Solana developers are actively working on the following:
Developed by Jump Crypto, Firedancer is a new validator written in C/C++.
It aims to process millions of TPS, with improved memory handling and parallelism.
Firedancer also decouples networking from transaction processing, reducing bottlenecks.
Future versions will feature:
Global fee adjustments to maintain healthy dynamics
More granular priority fee controls
Solana is introducing compressed accounts and Merkle trees to support light clients and scalable airdrops, further optimizing throughput.
Solana also emphasizes developer responsibility in maintaining network health:
Use prioritization_fee_lamports properly
Minimize account locks to avoid conflict with other transactions
Avoid polling transactions frequently, which increases RPC load
Design scalable programs with efficient CU usage
By following Solana Labs’ guidelines, developers can avoid unnecessary strain on the network.
Solana’s approach to handling network congestion is multi-faceted — leveraging architectural innovation, fee dynamics, and constant protocol evolution. While it has faced growing pains under mass adoption, its resilience has improved with each challenge.
Key takeaways:
Local fee markets have introduced effective transaction prioritization.
QUIC and compute budgets enhance node communication and fairness.
The future holds even greater promise with Firedancer and sharding innovations.
In the high-stakes world of high-throughput blockchains, Solana continues to set the pace for innovation — not just in speed, but also in adaptive scalability.
